North East Democratic Assoc.
blank spacebullet Home
blank spacebullet Events
blank spacebullet Login/Register
blank spacebullet NorthEastTn Blog
blank spacebullet Chairman's Comments
   

  Democrats Muster on the Mount Event.

 To purchase tickets for the event click on the picture above..

 

 
NorthEastTn Blog

Do You Have Fire Care?

Do you have Fire Care? This is a humorous satirical video   about how silly it is to not have Universal Health Care.

 

 
Posted by Susan Acito at 04:52 PM on Jun-30-2009
Comments (0) | Permalink
TAGS: health care, single-payer
Digg!  Bookmark this on del.icio.us
 

GOP has plans for redistricting

tennessean.com

June 22, 2009

GOP has plans for redistricting

By Matt Wilson
CHATTANOOGA TIMES FREE PRESS

Tennessee Republicans don't plan to pull any punches if they keep their majorities in the General Assembly and control redistricting legislative boundaries after the 2010 census.

read more
 
Posted by Jeff Adams at 05:11 PM on Jun-23-2009
Comments (1) | Permalink
TAGS: tennessee redistricting, tn house, legislative redistricting tn, republicians, democrats
Digg!  Bookmark this on del.icio.us
 

Sen. Diane Black makes “world’s worst” list

read more
 
Posted by Jeff Adams at 10:38 PM on Jun-21-2009
Comments (0) | Permalink
TAGS: Tenneesse democrats, Diana Black, racism, email
Digg!  Bookmark this on del.icio.us
 

The Elderly

I don't know about you all, but I love my grandparents. At least I did when they were alive. We eventually had to put nurses in their homes to take care of them. As far as I know they were not abused by their caretakers. And if they were abused you can guarantee that we would have fought Hell and high water to take vengeance for them. This is where this story starts. In nursing homes and with Republicans.

read more
 
Posted by Jon Webster at 05:44 PM on Jun-19-2009
Comments (0) | Permalink
TAGS: none
Digg!  Bookmark this on del.icio.us
 

Elements of an Economic Disaster

By Peter Stevenson

AFTER WWII, THE US HAD:

- Land
- Intact productive capacity
- A finance system for private homeownership
- Lots of young people looking for jobs and housing
- The knowledge that if all these weren’t used effectively, the nation would retreat back into depression.



ELEMENTS OF SUBURBIA

- New, single-family, detached homes built outside of the city
- Highways to connect them with one another and cities (National Highway Defense)
- Tax policies to support system:
- Mortgage interest deduction now used
- Depreciation for new construction but not rehab
- Low gas taxes and destruction of trolley cars
- US paid for new sewer construction only



ALL HELD TOGETHER BY

– The Cold War, which provided ideological basis for military production that continued after WWII
– “American Way of Life” ideology contributed to consumption/increased production




WINDS OF CHANGE....

1960s:
– Vietnam War (paid for on credit card through deficit spending)
– Civil Rights Movement and creation of Great Society
– By 1968, Fannie Mae is privatized to take funding off the federal budget.
– Homeownership expands to 60%

1970s:

Long growth based on post-war production and cold war ideology ends
Stagflation (inflation and high interest rates .. 10% - 14%)
OPEC Oil Embargo
Freddie Mac is formed to create “competition” for Fannie Mae




THE BIG SHIFT: 1980-1990:

– De-industrialization occurs as production goes overseas and capital accumulation moves to financial sector.
– Income gap starts to widen even as productivity increases
– Households maintain standard of living through massive entry of women into workplace
– Homeownership rate goes flat – stays flat, see beginnings of larger scale homelessness (bag ladies)
– Ideology of neoliberalism cemented with fall of Soviet Union – Seen as evidence of TINA




FINANCIAL CRISIS I

– Deregulation of S & L’s.
– No longer limited to home mortgages, begin wider, riskier investments, including overseas.
– Banks no longer required to only lend in mortgages the equivalent of their deposits
– “Disintermediation”
– S&L’s go too far, make risky deals
– Many fail – are bailed out.
– Properties foreclosed go into Resolution Trust Corporation




TOIL & TROUBLE, BOIL & BUBBLE…. 1990 - 2000

– Income gap widens
– Homeownership rate remains flat at 64%
– Homes increase in size (1990 average: 1500 sq.ft., 2000 average: 2100 sq. ft.)
– Advent of the McMansion
– Dot-com boom & bust
– Asian financial crisis





END THE CENTURY WITH A BANG....

1999: Congress passes Financial Services Modernization Act which repeals Glass-Steagall Act of 1933

– Established FDIC (insure deposits)
– Separated banks according to type (Commercial banks vs. investment banks)
– Intended to bring transparency and accountability to financial sector to prevent a run on the banks like occurred in 1932-1933
– First merger after repeal is Travelers Insurance and CitiBank (became CitiGroup).


2000: Congress passes the Commodities Futures Modernization Act

– Repeals 1922 legislation that outlawed “Bucket Shops” (off-site betting establishments that took bets on prices of commodities – “commodities bookies”)
– Specifically prevented states from passing any legislation limiting this type of betting


2001: September 11 attacks, and subsequent wars (also paid for on credit card through deficit spending)







INTRODUCING...



THE PLAYERS...

1) BROKERS
– Unlicensed, not regulated
– Represented the lenders, not the buyers (different than 30 years ago)
– No investment of their own (sold the loan usually within days)
– Incentive to sell high because fees based on size of loan
– DID NOT LEND THEIR OWN MONEY


2) BANKERS (mortgage lenders)
– Includes mortgage companies (brokers may or may not work for them)
– Didn’t hold the loan, pooled it with others and sold them through to Wall Street
– Important note: Remember deregulation of the 1980s: banks (not mortgage companies) could only lend as much as they held in deposits. After deregulation, could lend larger amounts because they weren’t holding the loans.
– WERE NOT LENDING THEIR OWN MONEY


3) SECURITIZERS
– Operated as the go-betweens for banks and investors
– Took the bundles to Wall Street as “mortgage-backed securities”
– Got the bundles rated by bond companies
– Were paid fees for bundling and selling packages
– WERE NOT LENDING THEIR OWN MONEY


4) INVESTORS
- Bought the ‘Security’ - provided the money
- Got the money from Pension funds, Local governments, etc


5) BORROWERS
– Expanding the “ownership” society engendered new products that allowed formerly unqualified borrowers to become qualified
– Since everyone was unregulated, incentive to create new products was driven by loan system, not borrowers needs
– Borrowers pushed by ideology, desire & need for wealth accumulation, hedge against social insecurity





THE "VILLAIN"...

1) SUBPRIME LOANS
– Adjustable-rate interest with low introductory rate that balloons later
– No money down (NINA – No Income, No Assets) – “Liar’s Loans”
– Serial re-finance loans
– Home equity loans
– Complicated documents, several inches thick
– Everyone involved: brokers, real estate agents, appraisers, lenders
– Assumption was value would ALWAYS increase
- total value of risky loans less than $50 trillion


2) SONS OF SUBPRIME…
– Collateral Debt Obligations (CDOs)
– MBS which have been separated out and re-packaged into “tranches” (slices).
– Although the subprime loans are in their own tranche, the way they are sold, the position of the investors (who gets paid first), lax oversight – and the assumption of a default rate based on prime loan history – allow the subprime CDOs to be rated high (AAA) for sale to investors.


3) CREDIT DEFAULT SWAPS
– A type of “insurance” but completely unregulated
– Buyer of swap purchases the “right” to be paid if the underlying mortgage loans default
– One investor buys swap “insurance”
Seller re-sells the swap without knowledge of the first investor.
By 2006-2007, credit swaps were for all sorts of loans (credit cards, auto loans, etc)
Modern version of the “bucket shops” outlawed in 1922 and re-introduced in 2000.
- Total derivatives liability (the side-betting on defaults of mortgage backed securities which contain sub-prime mortgages) created from 2000 to 2008 is $516 trillion, or 50 times world GDP


4) HEDGE FUNDS
– Investment vehicle
- Unregulated
- Buy whatever they want – usually risky, “exotic” securities.
- Became big in the late 1990s
- Got big enough that banks got into the act
- Known for high returns, but this causes them to take greater risk, increasing exposure to systemic failure





AND THEN....

- The first ARM interest rate increases on subprime loans started kicking in (2005) and people couldn’t pay the increase
- Someone lost their job and couldn’t pay a mortgage that was too high
- The drip became a flood and created a negative feedback loop





MARCH – OCTOBER 2008


- Starting with Bear Stearns in March, through the receivership of Fannie & Freddie in July through the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers in September.
- US government proposes $700 billion “bailout”.
- Starts as purchase of “toxic” MBS to avoid triggering additional derivatives liabilities
- Moves into purchase of stock
- Will likely end up with re-working mortgage loans.
- No way could the US ever finance the total liabilities of all remaining deriviatives





THE FINANCIAL CRISIS STEMS FROM A POLITICAL ECONOMY THAT

- Allows markets to dominate society instead of society dominating markets
- Is dependent on growth and accumulation in these markets
- Commodifies all things including nature, labor and social goods (in this case--shelter)
- Creates belief systems that support this economy as natural (“markets are the most efficient way of allocating goods and services”)





WHAT’S ON TAP…

- Stimulus Stimulus Stimulus
- Tax code
- Health care
- Stop hemorrhage of foreclosures/revamp financial system
- Deficit spending and national debt

 

 
Posted by Jeff Adams at 05:18 PM on Jun-17-2009
Comments (0) | Permalink
TAGS: economics, northeast democrats, cds, subprime loans, hedge funds, derivatives
Digg!  Bookmark this on del.icio.us
 
 
 
donate to neda
   
My contribution: $
blog/news feed
   

comments
   
 
GOP has plans for redistricting
Susan: I certainly expected this all along, that's how they operate.
How Kent Williams became the House's new speaker
generic celexa: Is there life before death?
How Kent Williams became the House's new speaker
zhfgdoyx: this link">sjoacybf [URL=this link]mlymjoqg[/URL] fzehxxze
How Kent Williams became the House's new speaker
jzbcgeas: qguhxxrk this link zsjfhsow gtjbhlcx this link">hsxrsmjv [URL=
How Kent Williams became the House's new speaker
simvastatin: this link simvastatin epigastrium dozed How Kent Williams became the House's new speaker
ysceflzf: jffsbzjd this link onstnaap vqbjvxxf
How Kent Williams became the House's new speaker
fqvfrssj: hnixelmg this link blnfsymd fieirvls this link">suntnbjh [URL=
How Kent Williams became the House's new speaker
vojjdllw: [URL=this link]dekmtfvr[/URL] this link">rcbkfbuf udbtezbr
What path will Shipley follow?
Michael: He didn't win by much - I hope Dems in Sulliban are fired up enough to blast Shipley out of office.
What path will Shipley follow?
Jill: We know what kind of man that Sir Shipley is. He is a man that condescends based on a preceived racial superiority, a preceived religious superiority,...
 
RSS Feed
Import to Yahoo RSS
© 2009 NEDA.
home | events | login/register | northeasttn blog | chairman's comments |
Copyright 2003-2009, campaignwindow.com™
Find out how you can create your own political website!
poweredby campaign